Healthcare Innovation Stories

UAB presents at 16th Annual Academic Surgical Congress showing 94.7% patient activation with Patient Engagement Technology

September 9, 2021
By
seamless

UAB recently presented an abstract at the 16th Annual Academic Surgical Congress entitled, “Who chooses not to use Patient Engagement Technology (PET)?” which examines the key factors behind why Colorectal, Cardiac, Thoracic and Gynecology patients may or may not choose to enroll in a PET. Specifically, the study explores the association of patient demographics and insurance status on declining to enroll in a PET.


Here are the key takeaways from the study:

  • Patient adoption of PET patients undergoing major surgery is high (94.7%)
  • Older patients & patients who are not privately insured are more likely to decline PET enrollment
  • PET technology is not universally adopted by all patients; therefore, alternative resources should be provided for patients who do not use PET

These results reveal that in order to achieve ideal clinical outcomes with Patient Engagement Technology, it is important to consider and address factors contributing to lower patient adoption rates before implementation. See below for a summary of the data and key takeaways from the study or click here to download the full case study.



UAB presents at 16th Annual Academic Surgical Congress showing 94.7% patient activation with Patient Engagement Technology

Posted by:
seamless
on
September 9, 2021

UAB recently presented an abstract at the 16th Annual Academic Surgical Congress entitled, “Who chooses not to use Patient Engagement Technology (PET)?” which examines the key factors behind why Colorectal, Cardiac, Thoracic and Gynecology patients may or may not choose to enroll in a PET. Specifically, the study explores the association of patient demographics and insurance status on declining to enroll in a PET.


Here are the key takeaways from the study:

  • Patient adoption of PET patients undergoing major surgery is high (94.7%)
  • Older patients & patients who are not privately insured are more likely to decline PET enrollment
  • PET technology is not universally adopted by all patients; therefore, alternative resources should be provided for patients who do not use PET

These results reveal that in order to achieve ideal clinical outcomes with Patient Engagement Technology, it is important to consider and address factors contributing to lower patient adoption rates before implementation. See below for a summary of the data and key takeaways from the study or click here to download the full case study.



Recent news from SeamlessMD

240: Lee Health's Jon Witenko: Why Ambient AI Stalls the Moment It Leaves the Ambulatory Clinic, Why He Stopped Waiting for the Perfect Smart Room, and 60-Second Pitches to Get Your Project Funded
September 10, 2026

240: Lee Health's Jon Witenko: Why Ambient AI Stalls the Moment It Leaves the Ambulatory Clinic, Why He Stopped Waiting for the Perfect Smart Room, and 60-Second Pitches to Get Your Project Funded

Learn More
239: Saint Francis' CMO Dr. Reetu Singh: Why to Shop for Digital Tools the Way You Shop at Home Depot, the Hidden Cost of Standardizing Patient Care, and the Signal That Beats Every Dashboard Metric
September 3, 2026

239: Saint Francis' CMO Dr. Reetu Singh: Why to Shop for Digital Tools the Way You Shop at Home Depot, the Hidden Cost of Standardizing Patient Care, and the Signal That Beats Every Dashboard Metric

Learn More
238: Essentia Health’s ACMIO Dr. Dave Kunstman: The Voice Agent Epic’s Agent Factory Built in Under a Day, Why Faster Builds Mean Faster Mistakes, and Why Ambient AI Is Care Redesign, Not Documentation
September 1, 2026

238: Essentia Health’s ACMIO Dr. Dave Kunstman: The Voice Agent Epic’s Agent Factory Built in Under a Day, Why Faster Builds Mean Faster Mistakes, and Why Ambient AI Is Care Redesign, Not Documentation

Learn More